Representing Domestic Containment through Inter-character Negative Judgements: Discourse Analysis of Career Talk in I Love Lucy (1951-52)

Autori

  • Jukke Kaaronen University of Helsinki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-454X/16513

Parole chiave:

evaluation, judgement, sitcom, domestic, oppression

Abstract

This paper approaches fictional telecinematic discourse from a perspective of inter-character negative evaluation in a specific context. The paper adapts a categorisation for interpersonal negative judgements and uses it to analyse instances of negative evaluation where participation in career practices are negotiated between the marital couple of Lucy and Ricky Ricardo in the classic sitcom I Love Lucy. A recurring theme in the show, Lucy’s desire to star in show business and Ricky’s attempts to thwart her ambitions have been discussed as both a representation of domestic containment typical to Post-War gender roles as well as an example of early feminist representation in televised sitcoms. The analysis reveals three intertwined facets of containment: Moral judgements condemning the oppressive behaviour of restricting Lucy’s access to career opportunities, moral judgements condemning the subversion of authority, and moral judgements of fairness condemning the distribution of social resources.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Bednarek, Monika (2009). “Dimensions of Evaluation: Cognitive and Linguistic Perspectives.” Pragmatics & Cognition 17(1): 146–175. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed

Bednarek, Monika (2010). The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. New York/London: Continuum.

Bednarek, Monika (2018). Language and Television Series: A Linguistic Approach to TV Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brock, Alexander (2015). “Participation frameworks and participation in televised sitcom, candid camera and stand-up comedy.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, edited by Jan Chovanec and Marta Dynel, 27–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Bubel, Claudia M. (2008). “Film Audiences as Overhearers.” Journal of Pragmatics 40(1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001

Chovanec, Jan and Marta Dynel (2015). “Researching Interactional Forms and Participant Structures in Public and Social Media.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, edited by Jan Chovanec and Marta Dynel, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Culpeper, Jonathan (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, Jonathan and Carolina Fernandez-Quintanilla (2017). “Fictional Characterisation.” In Pragmatics of Fiction, edited by Miriam A. Locher and Andreas H. Jucker, 93–128. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Dynel, Marta (2013). “Impoliteness as Disaffiliative Humour in Film Talk.” In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory edited by Marta Dynel, 105–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Dynel, Marta (2017). “(Im)politeness and telecinematic discourse.” In Pragmatics of Fiction, edited by Miriam A. Locher and Andreas H. Jucker, 93–128. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Graham, Jesse, Jonathan Haidt, Sena Koleva, Matt Motyl, Ravi Iyer, Sean P. Wojcik, and Peter H. Ditto (2013). “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology vol. 47 edited by Patricia Devine and Ashby Plant, 55–130. Academic Press Inc.

Gray, Frances (1994). Women and Laughter. Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.

Haidt, Jonathan (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.

Kozloff, Sarah (2000). Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Landay, Lori (2005). “I Love Lucy: Television and Gender in Postwar Domestic Ideology.” In The Sitcom Reader: America Viewed and Skewed edited by Mary M. Dalton and Laura R. Linder, 87–98. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Lemke, Jay L. (1998). “Resources for Attitudinal Meaning: Evaluative Orientations in Text Semantics.” Functions of Language 5(1): 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem

Malrieu, Jean Pierre (1999). Evaluative Semantics: Language, Cognition and Ideology. London/New York: Routledge.

Marc, David (1989). Comic Visions: Television Comedy and American Culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

Martin, J.R. and P. R. R. White (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

McIntyre, Dan and Derek Bousfield (2017). “Impoliteness in Fictional Texts.” In: The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 759–783. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mellencamp, Patricia (1992). High Anxiety: Catastrophe, Scandal, Age, & Comedy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Mills, Brett (2009). The Sitcom. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Rowe, Kathleen (1995). The Unruly Woman: Gender and the Genres of Laughter. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Taylor, Ella (1989). Prime-Time Families: Television Culture in Post-War America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Thompson, Geoff (2014). “Affect and Emotion, Target-Value Mismatches, and Russian Dolls.” In Evaluation in Context edited by Geoff Thompson and Laura Alba-Juez, 47–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Thompson, Geoff and Susan Hunston (2000). “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse edited by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. New York: Oxford University Press.

TV Shows

I Love Lucy (1951-1957) Season 1 Produced by Jess Oppenheimer. Directed by Marc Daniels. Written by Jess Oppenheimer, Madelyn Pugh and Bob Carroll, Jr. CBS.

I Married Joan (1952-1955)

Make Room for Daddy (1953-1957)

Downloads

Pubblicato

2024-02-05

Come citare

Kaaronen, J. (2023). Representing Domestic Containment through Inter-character Negative Judgements: Discourse Analysis of Career Talk in I Love Lucy (1951-52). Series - International Journal of TV Serial Narratives, 9(1), 05–20. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-454X/16513

Fascicolo

Sezione

Narrazioni / Estetica / Critica